Skip to content
← All articles

Aqua Voice Review 2026: Avalon, Pricing and Verdict

Kana Team
Aqua Voice marketing card on a pale background reading We have typed for 150 years, it is time to speak, with the subhead Fast, accurate, and private voice dictation and a Mac, Windows and iPhone label
Image: Aqua Voice (aquavoice.com)

Aqua Voice is a dictation app for Mac, Windows and iPhone that runs its own speech model, Avalon, on its own servers. It is aimed at people who dictate words a general model gets wrong: function names, acronyms, product names, medical and legal terms.

We build Kana, a Mac dictation app that keeps recognition on your machine, so treat this as a review by a competitor and check the claims against Aqua’s own site.

Short answer: Aqua is the stronger pick if you dictate technical vocabulary, if you work across Mac, Windows and iPhone, or if you are on an Intel Mac. It is a subscription and your audio goes to Aqua’s servers, which is the trade it makes for the model. Kana runs on device, costs $9.99 once, and only covers Apple Silicon Macs.

What Aqua Voice actually is

Hold a shortcut, speak, and the text lands in whatever app has focus. Aqua’s site lists Gmail, Google Docs, Slack, ChatGPT, Claude, VS Code and Cursor among “50+” applications it works in.

The recognition itself happens in Aqua’s cloud. Avalon is the company’s own model rather than a Whisper checkpoint, and the site claims “97.3% accuracy on AISpeak” and 230 words a minute against 40 for typing, which it rounds to “5x faster than typing”. Those are Aqua’s numbers, published by Aqua. We have not measured them.

Language coverage is 49. Kana covers 26: English and 24 other European languages on Parakeet, and Japanese on a separate engine.

Avalon, and the vocabulary problem

Every dictation app is fine at ordinary prose. They separate on the words that are not ordinary.

Say a colleague’s surname, an internal project codename or useSyncExternalStore out loud into a general speech model and you get a plausible English word back. Aqua’s answer is two-part: a model trained toward that vocabulary, and a dictionary you fill in yourself.

An illustration from Aqua Voice showing an Add new word input field above rows of empty grey placeholder chips, representing the custom dictionary

Source: Aqua Voice (aquavoice.com)

The dictionary is metered by plan: the free Starter tier allows 5 custom values, Pro allows 800. Kana has custom vocabulary too, with no published cap, but no model trained toward technical speech behind it. On code identifiers and jargon, Aqua has the better story and it is not close.

Aqua also carries writing styles, where you set rules about tone and the model applies them.

An illustration from Aqua Voice showing two writing style rule cards, one reading Use all lowercase in iMessage, Slack, and Signal and do not start sentences with And or Because, the other reading Use lowercase or all caps and choose short sentences or long thoughtful ones

Source: Aqua Voice (aquavoice.com)

Kana’s rewriting is closer to this than it looks: you write the instruction yourself and can route a different one per app. The difference is that Aqua applies its styles inside the same cloud round trip, and Kana only rewrites when you have paid for rewriting and turned it on.

Pricing in 2026

Aqua publishes five tiers. Starter is free and gives you “1,000 free words” with the Aqua engine plus those 5 dictionary values. Pro is $8 a month. Max is $24 a month and adds a real-time mode and spoken commands such as “send it”. Team is $12 per user per month. Enterprise is custom.

The free tier is a sample rather than a plan. A thousand words is roughly four minutes of talking, so you will decide about Pro on your first afternoon.

Kana is $9.99 once for unlimited dictation and unlimited file transcription with SRT, VTT and Markdown export, and none of it expires. AI rewriting is the one subscription, at $4.90 a month or $49 a year, covering three Macs. The full list is on the pricing page.

What Aqua Voice does better than Kana

Technical vocabulary. Avalon is built for it and Kana’s model is not. If your day is spent dictating identifiers, drug names or case citations, this is the whole comparison.

It runs where Kana does not. Mac, Windows and iPhone under one account, and the Mac download page offers an Intel build. Kana is Apple Silicon only and will stay that way, so a 2019 MacBook Pro rules it out entirely.

More languages. 49 against 26.

It keeps your transcripts. Aqua has a history view, so you can go back to something you dictated last Tuesday. Kana keeps nothing once the text is inserted, which is a deliberate choice and still a missing feature if you wanted the record.

A team tier exists. $12 per user per month, with an enterprise option above it. Kana has no team plan, no admin console and nothing to hand an IT department.

Where Kana differs

Aqua VoiceKana
Where recognition runsAqua’s serversYour Mac
Works with no networkNoYes
PlatformsMac, Windows, iPhoneApple Silicon Macs only
Intel MacsYesNo
Languages4926
Model tuned for technical termsYes, AvalonNo
Custom vocabularyYes, 5 free, 800 on ProYes
Transcript historyYesNo, nothing is kept
Cost to dictateFree for 1,000 words, then $8 a month$9.99 once, unlimited
File transcription with subtitlesNot listedIncluded, SRT and VTT
Account requiredYesNo

The one that decides it for most people is the first row. Aqua’s Privacy Mode says “nothing is stored on our servers at all”, which is a promise about retention. Kana makes no network call when you dictate, which is a different claim and is checked in CI rather than written in a policy. If your employer’s rule is that recordings may not leave the machine, retention promises do not help you.

Everything else follows from that. No account, no sign-in, no sync, nothing to delete later. The app bundle is 2.4 MB with nothing in the Dock, though the speech model is a separate download of several hundred megabytes.

For the rows laid out against each other, including the ones Aqua wins, see Kana and Aqua Voice compared.

Who should use Aqua Voice

  • You dictate code, medical or legal vocabulary all day
  • You work across Mac, Windows and iPhone
  • You are on an Intel Mac
  • You want your transcripts kept and searchable
  • You need a language outside Kana’s 26
  • You want a team plan with per-seat billing

Who should use Kana instead

  • Your audio is not allowed to leave your machine
  • You want dictation to be $9.99 once rather than $8 a month
  • You dictate on a plane, a train or a bad hotel connection
  • You transcribe audio files and want SRT and VTT without paying
  • You would rather not create an account to type

FAQ

Is Aqua Voice free?

There is a free Starter tier of 1,000 words with 5 custom dictionary entries. After that, Pro is $8 a month, Max is $24, Team is $12 per user, and Enterprise is quoted.

Does Aqua Voice work offline?

No. Avalon runs on Aqua’s servers, so dictation needs a connection. Its Privacy Mode governs what happens to the audio after it arrives, not whether it is sent.

Is Aqua Voice accurate for technical terms?

That is the case it is built for. Aqua claims “97.3% accuracy on AISpeak” and sells a custom dictionary of up to 800 entries on Pro. We have run no independent test, and neither should you trust one from a competitor.

What is a good on-device alternative to Aqua Voice on a Mac?

Kana, if you are on Apple Silicon: dictation and file transcription are unlimited, nothing is uploaded, and no account is required. You give up Windows, iPhone, Intel Macs, most of the language coverage and the technical model to get it.

Deciding between the two? The Kana and Aqua Voice comparison puts them side by side, including what Aqua Voice does better.

Last updated 6 August 2026.